ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Case Report: Solitary adrenal metastasis from esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Solitary adrenal metastasis from a primary esophageal malignancy is relatively rare. While there are case reports of aggressive treatment with esophagectomy and adrenalectomy providing long-term survival, the treatment paradigm is not well defined. Complications from esophageal adenocarcinoma and its treatment can significantly impact the patient's quality of life and prognosis. Case presentation: Our patient was treated with systemic therapy and, although he initially had a complete response, he later experienced local disease progression along with the development of additional metastatic sites. The patient began FOLFOX, a standard chemotherapy regimen for esophageal/gastric cancer. He experienced side effects such as fever, malaise, and constipation, which were symptomatically managed. Given these side effects, the patient's FOLFOX regimen underwent a 25% dose reduction of the 5FU bolus. A PET/CT scan after three months showed a marked response to chemotherapy, with complete resolution of detectable disease. The patient reported fatigue, bone pain managed with Neulasta, nausea controlled with antiemetics, and neuropathy in his feet. The patient then began a new chemotherapy regimen with Taxol/Ramucirumab with dose modifications in response to side effects. Continued adjustments to the treatment and dosages were made for progressive side effects and the patient elected to receive palliative radiation to the esophagus, along with holistic supportive care. The treatment plan shifted to palliative care, focusing on quality of life, rather than curative, due to the complexities of his cancer. Conclusion: While aggressive treatments may offer hope for a cure in select patients with isolated adrenal metastasis from esophageal cancer, the general approach should remain cautious, with systemic therapy as the first line of defense. This case highlights the need for careful selection to identify patients who may benefit from aggressive surgical treatment. Ongoing research and clinical trials are needed to better define treatment protocols and improve outcomes for this challenging patient group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.