Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40746984›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in physiology2025

The effect of respiratory muscle training on swimming performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shunfang Liu, Pengpeng Gou, Menglong Lin

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shunfang Liu *Faculty of Sport and Leisure, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, China.
Pengpeng Gou *Program in Global Exercise Science, Arts & Sports College, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Menglong LinFaculty of Sport and Leisure, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Respiratory muscle training, which targets the inspiratory and/or expiratory muscles to enhance respiratory efficiency, is recognized as a method for improving athletic performance; however, its effectiveness in enhancing swimming performance remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of respiratory muscle training on swimming performance. Methods: Methodology followed the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in eight databases (Web of Science, PubMed (comprising MEDLINE and PubMed Central), SPORTDiscus, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Embase, and ProQuest) and supplemented with manual searches of other sources (e.g., Google Scholar) up to 22 May 2025. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they met the following criteria: (a) participants were healthy individuals without diagnosed disease or disability; (b) the intervention involved respiratory muscle training compared to a sham or control condition in a randomized controlled trial or controlled clinical trial; (c) swimming performance was reported as an outcome with sufficient data to compute effect sizes; and (d) the full text was available. Results: Results of this systematic review revealed that of the 1,044 articles retrieved from the search strategy, 10 met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis indicated that respiratory muscle training significantly improved swimming performance, with low heterogeneity and no evidence of publication bias. Among the included studies, respiratory muscle training protocols were typically conducted at 50%-80% of maximal inspiratory pressure for 6-8 weeks, with a frequency of 3-14 sessions per week. However, substantial variability in training frequency, progression, and duration limited direct comparisons between interventions. Due to inconsistent and limited reporting, subgroup analysis based on gender, stroke style, or competitive level could not be performed. Discussion: Respiratory muscle training appears to be an effective adjunct to swimming training, contributing to improved performance. Future studies should prioritise protocol standardisation, elucidate the dose-effect relationship, and explore moderating factors such as gender, stroke type, and training status. Registered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD420251051091). Systematic Review Registration: Identifier CRD420251051091.

Indexed as

athletic adaptationinspiratory muscle trainingmeta-analysisrespiratory muscle trainingswimming performance

Identifiers

PMID40746984
PMCPMC12310600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.