Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40746961›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Thermodynamically consistent, reduced models of gene regulatory networks.

Michael Pan, Peter J Gawthrop, Matthew Faria, Stuart T Johnston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael PanSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8978-7350
Peter J GawthropDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6029-515X
Matthew FariaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Stuart T JohnstonSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4532-5573

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic biology aims to engineer novel functionalities into biological systems. While the approach has been predominantly applied to single cells, a richer set of biological phenomena can be engineered by applying synthetic biology to cell populations. To rationally design cell populations, we require mathematical models that link between intracellular biochemistry and intercellular interactions. In this study, we develop a kinetic model of gene expression that is suitable for incorporation into agent-based models of cell populations. To be scalable to large cell populations, models of gene expression should be both computationally efficient and compliant with the laws of physics. We satisfy the first requirement by applying a model reduction scheme to translation and the second requirement by formulating models using bond graphs, a modelling approach that ensures thermodynamic consistency. Our reduced model is significantly faster to simulate than the full model and reproduces important behaviours of the full model. We couple separate models of gene expression to build models of the toggle switch and repressilator. With these models, we explore the effects of resource availability and cell-to-cell heterogeneity on circuit behaviour. The modelling approaches developed here are a bridge towards engineering collective cell behaviours such as synchronization and division of labour.

Indexed as

bond graphgene regulatory networksthermodynamics

Identifiers

PMID40746961
PMCPMC12312648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.