Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40746944›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2025

Association of Blood Donor-derived Cell-free DNA Levels With Banff Scores and Histopathological Lesions in Kidney Allograft Biopsies: Results From an Observational Study.

Aylin Akifova, Klemens Budde, Mira Choi, Kerstin Amann, Maike Buettner-Herold, Michael Oellerich, Julia Beck, Kirsten Bornemann-Kolatzki, Ekkehard Schütz, Friederike Bachmann and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA as a Non-Invasive Readout of Activity Across the Rejection Continuum.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  5. Longitudinal Monitoring of Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Supports Risk Stratification in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Allograft Dysfunction.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Aylin AkifovaDepartment of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9227-8017
Klemens BuddeDepartment of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7929-5942
Mira ChoiDepartment of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0286-1491
Kerstin AmannDepartment of Nephropathology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Maike Buettner-HeroldDepartment of Nephropathology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Michael OellerichDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Julia BeckChronix Biomedical GmbH, Göttingen, Germany.
Kirsten Bornemann-KolatzkiChronix Biomedical GmbH, Göttingen, Germany.
Ekkehard SchützChronix Biomedical GmbH, Göttingen, Germany.
Friederike BachmannDepartment of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Fabian HalleckDepartment of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Eva V SchrezenmeierDepartment of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Evelyn SeelowDepartment of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Bianca ZukunftDepartment of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Charlotte HammettDepartment of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Nathan A PohlDepartment of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Benedetta MordàDepartment of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jan KowaldMedical Department III, Division of Nephrology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Nils LachmannInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Diana StauchInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Bilgin OsmanodjaDepartment of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8660-0722

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is an emerging biomarker of kidney allograft injury, mainly investigated in the context of rejection. However, the dd-cfDNA dynamics in other graft pathologies merit further investigation. Methods: In this single-center observational study, we prospectively collected dd-cfDNA at indication biopsies. To evaluate the association between dd-cfDNA and different histological patterns, we correlated absolute and relative dd-cfDNA (thresholds of 50 copies/mL and 0.5%, respectively) with the Banff 2022 lesion scores and the assigned diagnoses. Results: We examined 151 dd-cfDNA paired biopsies in 131 kidney transplant recipients and found significantly higher absolute dd-cfDNA levels in antibody-mediated rejection (n, median, IQR: 45, 63 copies/mL, 42-89), microvascular inflammation (MVI) without donor-specific antibodies or C4d-deposition (6, 102 copies/mL, 61-134), mixed rejection (8, 140 copies/mL, 77-171), and BK virus-associated nephropathy (6, 213 copies/mL, 83-298) compared with glomerulonephritis (20, 12 copies/mL, 8-18), calcineurin toxicity (19, 10 copies/mL, 7-16), interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (12, 10 copies/mL, 9-16) and normal histology (6, 9 copies/mL, 7-16). In the multivariable analysis, absolute and relative dd-cfDNA correlated with the peritubular capillaritis (ptc), glomerulitis (g), and tubulitis (t) scores. In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, absolute dd-cfDNA showed best discrimination for MVI of any cause (area under the curve [AUC] 0.88, sensitivity 0.71, specificity 0.86, positive predictive value [PPV] 0.76, negative predictive value [NPV] 0.82), followed by antibody-mediated rejection including mixed rejection (AUC 0.85, sensitivity 0.72, specificity 0.83, PPV 0.69, NPV 0.84), and overall rejection (AUC 0.83, sensitivity 0.66, specificity 0.85, PPV 0.76, NPV 0.77). T cell-mediated rejection was only detectable by dd-cfDNA when associated with vascular lesions. Conclusions: Altogether, we conclude that dd-cfDNA-release is not limited to rejection-related injury phenotypes and is mainly driven by MVI in kidney allografts.

Identifiers

PMID40746944
PMCPMC12313090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.