ArticleKidney medicine2025
Development of a Natural Language Processing Model for Extracting Kidney Biopsy Pathology Diagnoses.
Article in Kidney medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-powered prediction of diabetic complications: from clinical data to molecular omics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale & Objective: Kidney biopsy reports are in a nonindexed text format, and the diagnosis requires labor-intensive manual abstraction. Natural language processing (NLP) has not been rigorously tested for kidney biopsy diagnosis extraction. Our objective was to develop an accurate model to extract the biopsy diagnosis from free-text reports. Study Design: Text classification using NLP. Setting & Participants: 2,666 patients with 3,042 native kidney biopsy reports in the Portable Document Format, from June 2016 to December 2023. Predictor: Kidney biopsy diagnosis. Outcomes: The performance of the NLP algorithm for all and the 20 most common diagnoses based on precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC). Analytical Approach: A domain expert manually abstracted the diagnosis, and a renal pathologist validated a random subset (n = 200). Structured Query Language server and Python processed reports into machine-readable free text. We used PubMed Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers to develop our NLP algorithm. We randomly split the reports into training (80%; n = 2,434) and testing (20%; n = 608) sets to train the NLP system. We further divided the testing set into 20% validation and 80% fine-tuning sets. Results: The median age was 57 years, with 50% female, 29% African Americans, and 23% Hispanic participants. The 5 most frequent glomerular diagnoses were diabetic kidney disease (23.7%), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (15.5%), lupus nephritis (9.7%), immunoglobulin A nephropathy (8.9), and membranous nephropathy (7.2%). The Cohen kappa coefficient for interrater reliability was 0.76. PubMed Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers fine-tuned with a training set showed the average AUROC for NLP performance in the testing set of 0.95 across all diagnoses with an F1 score of 0.57. For the 20 most common diagnoses, the AUROC was 0.97 with an F1 score of 0.72. Limitations: Single centered; sample size and use limited to research purposes. Conclusions: We demonstrate an accurate and scalable NLP system to extract the primary diagnosis from free-text kidney biopsy reports, which can facilitate epidemiologic studies and identify patients for clinical trial recruitment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.