ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025
Deep learning-based classification of multiple fundus diseases using ultra-widefield images.
Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable Neutrosophic Knowledge Distillation Model for Ocular Disease Classification Using Ultra-Wide Field Fundus Images.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Ultra-widefield color fundus photography in diabetic retinopathy: from panretinal assessment to multimodal integration.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven diagnosis for age-related macular degeneration bridging pathology and engineering: a survey.International ophthalmology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to develop a hybrid deep learning model for classifying multiple fundus diseases using ultra-widefield (UWF) images, thereby improving diagnostic efficiency and accuracy while providing an auxiliary tool for clinical decision-making. Methods: In this retrospective study, 10,612 UWF fundus images were collected from the JiuJiang No. 1 People's Hospital and the Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University between 2020 and 2025, covering 16 fundus diseases, including normal fundus, nine common eye diseases, and six rare retinal conditions. The model employed DenseNet121 as a feature extractor combined with an XGBoost classifier. Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) was used to visualize the model's decision-making process. Performance was evaluated on validation and external test sets using accuracy, recall, precision, F1 score, and AUC-ROC. The model's diagnostic accuracy was also compared with that of junior and intermediate ophthalmologists. Results: The model demonstrated exceptional diagnostic performance. For common diseases such as retinal vein occlusion, age-related macular degeneration, and diabetic retinopathy, AUC values exceeded 0.975, with accuracy rates above 0.980. For rare diseases, AUC values were above 0.970, and accuracy rates surpassed 0.998. Grad-CAM visualizations confirmed that the model's focus areas aligned with clinical pathological features. Compared to ophthalmologists, the model achieved significantly higher accuracy across all diagnostic tasks. Conclusion: The proposed deep learning model can automatically identify and classify multiple ophthalmic diseases using UWF images. It holds promise for enhancing clinical diagnostic efficiency, assisting ophthalmologists in optimizing workflows, and improving patient care quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.