Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40746853›Full record

ArticleHuman organization2025

Virtuous circles: Valuations of plastic recycling in Johannesburg's inner city.

Eileen Moyer, Linda Musariri, Lucy Khofi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human organization, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eileen MoyerDepartment of Anthropology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1233-6041
Linda MusaririDepartment of Anthropology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6004-6380
Lucy KhofiDepartment of Anthropology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5271-9445

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaginings of the circular economy promise to minimize waste and maximize resource efficiency by ensuring that materials are reused, recycled or repurposed in a closed-loop system resulting, ideally, in 'zero waste'. Drawing on ethnographic research, in this article we analyze the valuation of plastic and food waste within Johannesburg's inner city, and the moral and material significance attributed to them by various stakeholders, including plastic recyclers, non-profit organizations, property developers and municipal workers. We question the practice of requiring individuals living in extreme precarity to earn food through plastic waste collection, the implications of charging for donated surplus food, the fate of unrecyclable plastic, urban gentrification, and gendered and migrant experiences. Focusing on a community-based program where individuals and families exchange plastic credits for food, we examine political, economic, and moral complexities while critically evaluating the narratives of zero waste and circular economy. We introduce the concept of "social plastic" to highlight how plastic and food recycling are integrated into political and moral agendas in Johannesburg, shaping the greenwashing and social washing practices of different actors.

Indexed as

Circular economyhungersocial plasticsocial washing

Identifiers

PMID40746853
PMCPMC12309450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.