Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40746835›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025

Comparison of the perioperative complications of high intensity focused ultrasound vs. laparoscopic surgery for uterine fibroids: a retrospective study.

Li Hu, Chunling Fang, Nenghuan Tang, Fan Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Li HuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Chunling FangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Nenghuan TangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Fan XuDepartment of Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternal and Infant Health Care Hospital, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare the perioperative complications following high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) or laparoscopic surgery for uterine fibroids. Methods: A retrospective cohort was conducted involving patients with uterine fibroids (UFs) who underwent HIFU or laparoscopic surgery. The primary outcome was the incidence of perioperative complications. Secondary outcomes included the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain assessment, duration of hospital stay, hospitalization costs, and the incidence of short-term postoperative complications within 1 month. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the influencing factors. Results: A total of 140 patients were included in the study, with an overall perioperative complication rate of 72.9%. Among them, 46 patients underwent HIFU treatment, while 94 underwent laparoscopic surgery. The HIFU group experienced significantly fewer total complications (52.2% vs. 83.0%, Conclusion: HIFU treatment is associated with a lower rate of perioperative complications, including grade ≥ II complications, reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and lower hospitalization costs compared to laparoscopic surgery. These findings suggest that HIFU may serve as a viable alternative strategy for the management of uterine fibroids.

Indexed as

Clavien–Dindo classificationhigh intensity focused ultrasoundlaparoscopic surgerynumerical rating scale (NRS)perioperative complications

Identifiers

PMID40746835
PMCPMC12310626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.