ArticleCureus2025
Leveraging Transfer Learning and Attention Mechanisms for a Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Classification Model.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning predicts stent implantation in borderline coronary lesions from angiography.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with late-stage diagnosis contributing to poor survival rates. Early detection remains a critical challenge, hindered by diagnostic delays, radiologist shortages, and the limitations of current imaging workflows. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning, offer new avenues to enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in radiology. Objective To develop and evaluate a deep learning model integrating Residual Network 50 Version 2 (ResNet50V2) with Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE) blocks for automated classification of lung cancer subtypes from computed tomography (CT) images. Methods A total of 1,000 anonymized lung CT images were obtained from a publicly available Kaggle dataset, categorized into four classes: adenocarcinoma, large cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and normal tissue. The dataset was split into training (70%), validation (10%), and test (20%) sets. A fine-tuned ResNet50V2 architecture with SE blocks was used to enhance channel-wise feature recalibration. The model was trained using categorical cross-entropy loss with label smoothing and optimized via Adam. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), precision, recall, and F1-score. Results The model achieved a test accuracy of 90.16% and an overall AUC of 0.9815. Class-wise AUCs were high across all categories: 0.9523 for adenocarcinoma, 0.9879 for large cell carcinoma, 0.9977 for normal tissue, and 0.9880 for squamous cell carcinoma. Precision ranged from 0.81 (large cell carcinoma) to 1.00 (normal tissue), while recall ranged from 0.85 (adenocarcinoma) to 0.98 (large cell carcinoma). F1-scores were consistently strong, ranging from 0.88 to 0.96. Conclusion The integration of SE blocks with ResNet50V2 yielded a high-performing model capable of accurately classifying lung cancer subtypes from CT images. The approach shows promise for assisting radiologists in diagnostic decision-making, particularly in settings with limited expert availability. Future work should focus on external validation, model interpretability, and exploration of emerging architectures such as Vision Transformers for enhanced performance and clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.