Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40746796›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Pediatrics Residents' Conference Attendance Does Not Predict Their In-Training Exam Scores.

Adin Nelson, Anjile An, Matthew Kapklein, Erika Abramson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adin NelsonPediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA.
Anjile AnPopulation Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA.
Matthew KapkleinPediatrics, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, USA.
Erika AbramsonPediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Residents work hard both at their clinical duties and at their learning, and they have limited time in which to balance the two. Existing evidence on the value of didactic conferences is mixed, and prior studies predate the increases in virtual and asynchronous learning since COVID-19. To address that gap, we explored the relationship between residents' attendance at didactic conferences and their medical knowledge as measured on annual standardized exams. Methods We conducted a retrospective national study assessing the relationships between pediatrics residents' attendance at didactic conferences and their scores on the American Board of Pediatrics In-Training Exam (ITE) from July 2022 through July 2023, adjusting for residents' level of training and prior exam scores. Results We analyzed data from 383 residents from 10 programs, and we found no significant correlation between conference attendance and ITE scores. Conclusions Didactic sessions are a required component of residency training, but we found that attendance at these sessions does not correlate with residents' performance on standardized exams. This highlights the need for future research exploring how didactic sessions can be made more effective and whether conference attendance might impact other outcomes such as clinical skills more than exam performance.

Indexed as

curriculumdidacticseducationexam preparationresidency

Identifiers

PMID40746796
PMCPMC12310564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.