Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40746756›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025

The art of falling: identifying the falls scenarios associated with bouldering injuries.

Erwan Beurienne, Nicolas Bailly, Maxime Luiggi, Cécile Martha, Claire Bruna-Rosso, Maxime Wylomanski, Michel Behr, Marine Dorsemaine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Erwan BeurienneLaboratoire de Biomécanique Appliquée, Aix Marseille Université/Université Gustave Eiffel, Marseille, France.
Nicolas BaillyLaboratoire de Biomécanique Appliquée, Aix Marseille Université/Université Gustave Eiffel, Marseille, France.
Maxime LuiggiADEF, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Cécile MarthaISM, CNRS, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Claire Bruna-RossoLaboratoire de Biomécanique Appliquée, Aix Marseille Université/Université Gustave Eiffel, Marseille, France.
Maxime WylomanskiTyyny, Context', Le Chambon-Feugerolles, France.
Michel BehrLaboratoire de Biomécanique Appliquée, Aix Marseille Université/Université Gustave Eiffel, Marseille, France.
Marine DorsemaineLaboratoire de Biomécanique Appliquée, Aix Marseille Université/Université Gustave Eiffel, Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Bouldering has seen a significant rise in popularity, accompanied by an increase in related injuries, primarily caused by falls. To enhance prevention strategies and improve protective mats, it is crucial to understand the mechanisms behind these injuries. However, there is limited knowledge about the specific fall scenarios leading to bouldering injuries. The aim of this study was to provide a detailed description of accident scenarios and fall kinematics leading to bouldering injuries. Methods: Adults (aged 18 and above) who experienced an acute fall-related injury while bouldering were invited to complete a self-reported online survey. They were recruited between February 2024 and March 2025 through emails and QR-code posters via university mailing lists and partnerships with French bouldering gym franchises. A total of 245 participants provided personal information, descriptions of their injuries, details about the climbing routes, and fall scenarios, including the kinematics of the fall. Results: A majority of the injuries affected the lower limb (67% of the case) with ankle sprain being the primary injury. Most of the falls (85%) were involuntary with 62% of them starting in a vertical position, frequently followed by a rotation during the fall (62%), and resulted in a feet first landing (74%). Most injuries happened after falls from vertical walls (45%) and steep walls (29%), primarily from the middle (32%) and the top (47%) sections of the wall. Conclusion: These results provide a first detailed description of the fall scenarios associated with injuries in bouldering and show that different injury mechanisms (such as vertical versus leaning positions during a fall) result in distinct patterns of injury. Such findings could be used to develop new pads with higher density or multi-layering, or to devise safer falling techniques that can be taught by trainers.

Indexed as

boulderingclimbingfallinjurykinematicspads

Identifiers

PMID40746756
PMCPMC12312403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.