Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40746746›Full record

ArticleAnalytical science advances2025

Development of a Model for Predicting the Thermophysical Properties of Carbon Materials and Proposal of Manufacturing Conditions Using the Model.

Masayoshi Matsubara, Ryo Sasaki, Jun P Takahara, Shinji Moritake, Yasuyuki Harada, Hiromasa Kaneko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Masayoshi MatsubaraDepartment of Applied Chemistry School of Science and Technology Kanagawa Japan.
Ryo SasakiMitsubishi Chemical Corporation Tokyo Japan.
Jun P TakaharaMitsubishi Chemical Corporation Tokyo Japan.
Shinji MoritakeMitsubishi Chemical Corporation Tokyo Japan.
Yasuyuki HaradaMitsubishi Chemical Corporation Tokyo Japan.
Hiromasa KanekoDepartment of Applied Chemistry School of Science and Technology Kanagawa Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A steelmaking method using electric furnaces is attracting attention in the iron and steel industry, and a carbon material called needle coke is used as an aggregate for the electrode in electric steelmaking. The performance of needle coke as an aggregate for electrodes in steelmaking is greatly affected by the quality of the needle coke, which depends on the ingredients of the raw materials and the process conditions. Because the raw material ingredients are not always constant and depend on the place and time they are produced, the quality of the needle coke is not stable under the same process conditions. Therefore, it is necessary to optimise the process conditions. In this study, to optimise the process conditions using machine learning, a model was constructed to predict the thermophysical properties of needle coke from the raw material ingredients and process conditions based on previous data. Because the subject plant is operated in a dynamic process and there is a time delay in the previous data, the genetic-algorithm-based process variables and dynamics selection method, which selects the time delays and process variable regionally, was studied. Furthermore, inverse analysis was performed on a sample whose quality was considered to be outside the specifications based on the previous data, with the aim of controlling the quality within the product specifications by changing only the process conditions.

Indexed as

genetic algorithmgenetic‐algorithm‐based process variables and dynamics selectionmachine learningneedle cokeprocess conditionstime delay

Identifiers

PMID40746746
PMCPMC12310388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.