ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Assessment of drug permeability using a small airway microphysiological system.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in New Approach Methodologies at FDA's Division of Applied Regulatory Science.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
- NAMs for closing knowledge gaps in assessment of respiratory uptake - a PARC project.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is a need to reliably predict the permeability of inhaled compounds during the development of new and generic drugs. A small airway microphysiological system (MPS) that can recapitulate the pulmonary air-liquid interface (ALI) with primary epithelial and vascular endothelial cell layers may provide a more physiologically relevant environment for measuring drug permeability than simpler two-dimensional Methodology: Primary human lung epithelial cells were seeded onto the top channel of the chip and cultured for 14 days at ALI to promote monolayer differentiation, followed by addition of endothelial cells into the bottom channel. Due to the non-specific binding properties of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), a drug absorption study was conducted to quantify non-specific binding to the material. Drug permeability was evaluated by passing each compound (10 µM) through the top channel and measuring the amount of drug that permeated into the bottom channel over the time course of 30, 60, 120, and 180 min. Results: Confocal micrographs demonstrated the presence of tight junctions along with basal, goblet, and ciliated cells in the top channel and attachment of endothelial cells in the bottom channel. Insignificant nonspecific binding to the MPS was observed with albuterol sulfate, formoterol fumarate, and olodaterol hydrochloride (HCl), while fluticasone furoate showed significant nonspecific binding as only 6%-44% of the drug was recovered at 30 and 120 min, respectively. As a result, fluticasone furoate was excluded from further analysis. Permeability studies estimated an apparent permeability (P Discussion: Taken together, the small airway MPS recapitulated relevant cell types and many morphological features in the lung. The apparent permeabilities measured indicated that albuterol sulfate and formoterol fumarate would be categorized as highly permeable, while olodaterol HCl would be categorized as a low permeable drug.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.