ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Evaluating the multi-dimensional values of bridge-tourism integration: an empirical study using the DEMATEL-ISM-MICMAC method.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the context of high-quality tourism development and the increasing emphasis on ecological conservation, bridge-tourism integration has emerged as an innovative model combining cultural, ecological, and economic values, demonstrating significant research potential. However, systematic analysis and comprehensive evaluation of this integration remain limited. To address this gap, the present study applies the integrated Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory, Interpretive Structural Modeling, and Cross-Impact Matrix Multiplication Applied to Classification (DEMATEL-ISM-MICMAC) approach to construct a multi-layered evaluation model for assessing these values. The findings identify historical context and architectural design as key drivers, significantly enhancing cultural appeal and ecological value. Intermediate factors, such as cultural activities and geographical location, are essential links within the system. Sub-base factors, including policy regulations and environmental friendliness, provide critical support for cultural preservation and ecological sustainability. In contrast, base-level factors, such as economic benefits and visitor satisfaction, directly reflect the integrated performance of bridge-tourism development. The study concludes that, through systematic management and policy support, bridge-tourism integration can effectively balance cultural preservation, ecological protection, and economic development, laying a solid foundation for its sustainable advancement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.