ArticleJournal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice2025
Exogenous Spatial Attention Helps Overcome Spatial Specificity of Visual Learning in the Blind Field After V1 Damage.
Article in Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generalisation of training-induced recovery in occipital stroke: neurochemical and fMRI correlates.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Systematic arcminute-scale fixational offsets in patients with early visual cortex damage.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Double training promotes retinotopic transfer of category learning.NPJ science of learning · 2026Article
- What V1 Damage Can Teach Us About Visual Perception and Learning.Annual review of vision science · 2025Review
- Perceptual learning improves discrimination but does not reduce distortions in appearance.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Multisensory stimuli facilitate low-level perceptual learning on a difficult global motion task in virtual reality.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual discrimination training can restore visual functions in the blind field of participants with stroke-induced V1 damage. However, single-stimulus training in this population is limited by spatial specificity. Thus, it requires iterative training over several months to achieve improvement at more than one blind-field location, particularly at sites further from the blind field border (i.e., deeper in the blind field). With neurotypical observers, exogenous spatial attention (SA) facilitates transfer of learning to untrained locations. Here, we asked if SA pre-cues could induce transfer of training deeper into cortically blinded (CB) fields. Twenty CB participants trained on a global motion discrimination task either using a single [primary] stimulus and no cues (Task 1), a single primary stimulus with a large pre-cue deep in the blind field (Task 2), two identical stimuli (primary and deep) with small pre-cues just above them (Task 3), or a single stimulus randomly alternating at a primary and deep blind-field location, forewarned by a small pre-cue above them on each trial (Task 4). Training on Task 1 induced reliable improvements at the primary location, but no transfer of learning deeper in the blind field. The addition of SA pre-cues in Tasks 2-4 induced transfer in more than half the participants, although threshold improvements at primary locations were smaller than for Task 1. We conclude that directing exogenous SA deep in the blind field attracts attention automatically in CB patients and facilitates transfer of learning towards cued locations, even without V1 processing for those regions of space.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.