Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40746632›Full record

ReviewLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2025

Preclinical Vocal Fold and Airway Injury Models: A Scoping Review.

Rahul D Patel, Nour Awad, Denzel Ryan D Cruz, Aida M Hasson, Cameron D Cook, Danielle Hall, Gregory R Dion

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Preclinical Vocal Fold and Airway Injury Models: A Scoping Review.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rahul D PatelCollege of Medicine, University of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio USA.
Nour AwadDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6900-2146
Denzel Ryan D CruzCollege of Medicine, University of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1289-6962
Aida M HassonDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio USA.
Cameron D CookBiomedical Engineering Program College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio USA.
Danielle HallDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio USA.
Gregory R DionCollege of Medicine, University of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4389-3104

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Preclinical models are necessary to study the pathophysiology of laryngotracheal diseases and novel treatments. Currently, there is no consensus on species, injury mechanics, and study duration This review provides a contemporary overview of the studies of vocal fold and laryngotracheal injuries in preclinical models. Methods: A search was performed in PubMed and Web of Science involving various animal models undergoing vocal fold, trachea, and laryngotracheal injury and/or wound healing studies from 2013 to 2023. Articles were independently screened and selected by four reviewers. Results: Of 1279 filtered studies, 197 studies were identified and categorized by species, study duration, and mechanism of injury (MOI): vocal fold stripping, intubation, lasers, microtools, scraping, and other MOIs. Within each MOI, studies were grouped by animal model, with subsections discussing tissue target, research aim, analysis method, and study duration. Leporine and rat models were the most employed animal models for both vocal fold wound healing and laryngotracheal models. Leporine studies had the broadest diversity in MOIs, with lasers, microtools, scraping, and other methods used. Comparatively, rat studies primarily utilized vocal fold stripping as a MOI, perhaps second to anatomic limitations. Larger species, specifically porcine models, were most prevalent in intubation injury studies. Ferret, mouse, and ovine models were less utilized. Study duration varied from 1 day to 3 months in vocal fold injury models and 30 min to 12 months in laryngotracheal injuries. Conclusion: This review provides a foundational framework to collate and interpret available data on preclinical vocal fold and laryngotracheal injury models to guide future study design. Level of Evidence: Five scoping review/NA.

Indexed as

laryngotracheal injurypre‐clinical modelsvocal fold injurywound healing

Identifiers

PMID40746632
PMCPMC12311988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.