ArticleInfection prevention in practice2025
3% hydrogen peroxide to disinfect urine-contaminated surfaces.
Article in Infection prevention in practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Disinfecting urine-contaminated floors, surfaces and objects is a persistent challenge in healthcare. While chlorine-based compounds such as bleach are often used to decontaminate surfaces, they are known to degrade plastics and may leave harmful residues and release potentially irritant vapors making them unsuitable disinfectants for materials that come in direct contact with humans. The objective of this study was to evaluate an alternative urine disinfection procedure. Treating urine-contaminated surfaces with 3% hydrogen peroxide (H Materials and methods: The effectiveness of disinfecting two materials, a flat plastic surface and a long lumen representing a more challenging surface to clean, was evaluated with a commonly used method of water and soap versus using a 3% H Results: Contamination persisted when washing with soap and water but was effectively removed after one hour of H Conclusions: The results show that bacteria can be removed from a urine-contaminated surface by being soaked in 3% H
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.