ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Integrating single-cell regulatory atlas and multi-omics data for differential treatment response and multimodal predictive modeling in CDK 4/6 inhibitor-treated breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of a Conserved Temporal Molecular Response Signature to CDK4/6 Inhibition Through Multi-Omics Integration Across Cancer Cell Lines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Construction and validation of a prognostic model associated with chromatin remodeling in hepatocellular carcinoma.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Molecular and cellular composition changes after neoadjuvant letrozole and palbociclib in early luminal breast cancer.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Integrated single-cell and bulk transcriptomic analyses reveal cDC1-centered ubiquitination dysregulation and identify UBE2F as a critical regulator in sepsis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: CDK4/6 inhibitors are cornerstone therapies for advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer, yet treatment response heterogeneity remains a major clinical challenge. This study integrates single-cell regulatory landscapes with multi-omics data to decode resistance mechanisms and develop predictive biomarkers for CDK4/6 inhibitor response stratification. Methods: Single-cell RNA-seq data (GSE158724, n=14 samples) and bulk multi-omics profiles (TCGA-BRCA, n=1,059; GSE186901, n=90) were analyzed. Gene regulatory networks were reconstructed using SCENIC to identify resistance-specific regulons. The Tumor Prognostic Regulon Index (TPRI) was derived from five prognostic transcription factors and validated in independent cohorts. Experimental validation including qPCR of core TFs was performed in patient-derived samples. Multimodal predictive models integrating TPRI, differentially expressed genes, and miRNAs were developed using logistic regression, with performance assessed via ROC/AUC analysis. Results: We identified 86 resistance-associated regulons and established TPRI based on five prognostic TFs (ATF1, TEAD4, NFIL3, FOXO1, ETV3). TPRI significantly stratified patients into high/low-risk groups with differential overall survival and treatment response (Fisher's exact test P=0.0237). qPCR confirmed elevated expression of these TFs in resistant tumors ( Discussion: This study establishes TPRI as a novel biomarker for CDK4/6 inhibitor response prediction, validated through multi-omics integration and qPCR confirmation. The model provides actionable risk stratification, where high-risk patients may benefit from combinatorial mTOR-targeted therapies. Limitations include sample size constraints for methylation integration. Future studies should validate these findings in prospective clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.