ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Percutaneous transhepatic recanalization of occluded prosthetic graft after pancreatoduodenectomy with venous reconstruction for pancreatic cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To investigate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic endovascular recanalization and stenting after venous graft thrombosis in pancreatic cancer patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with venous reconstruction and assess risk factors of occlusion. Methods: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board. The clinical characteristics of 227 patients who underwent PD were compared among patients who underwent PD with/without porto-mesenteric venous resection (PMVR) ± prosthetic graft interposition. Results: Out of 227 patients, 18 (8%) underwent PD with PMVR and prosthetic graft interposition. Seven out of 18 patients had prosthetic graft occlusion. Occlusion was symptomatic in most cases (86%) and associated with tumor recurrence in 43%. On univariable logistic regression analysis, small postoperative graft diameter (OR: 0.141; 95% CI 0.021-0.970) and caudal anastomosis diameter measured on CT (OR: 0.226; 95% CI 0.059-0.859) were clear predictors of graft occlusion ( Discussion: Percutaneous transhepatic prosthetic graft recanalization and stenting is feasible and may be considered a safe and effective technique with immediate restoration of porto-mesenteric blood flow and symptom relief. Small grafts and venous anastomosis diameters are particularly at risk of thrombosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.