ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Population-based colorectal cancer risk prediction using a SHAP-enhanced LightGBM model.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glycemic variability does not provide incremental prognostic value for in-hospital death in community-acquired pneumonia patients: conventional clinical variables dominate.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Liquid Biopsy in Colorectal Cancer: Future Perspectives Through the Lens of Artificial Intelligence-A Comprehensive Review of Novel Literature.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning-based predictive model for breast cancer bone metastasis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting postoperative fever after flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a pathomics model to predict SOX11 expression and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Integrated Analysis of SULF1, CXCL8, and PBLD Expression as Discriminative Biomarkers for Early Detection and Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a highly frequent cancer worldwide, and early detection and risk stratification playing a critical role in reducing both incidence and mortality. we aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model using clinical data to improve CRC identification and prognostic evaluation. Methods: We analyzed multicenter datasets comprising 676 CRC patients and 410 controls from Guigang City People's Hospital (2020-2024) for model training/internal validation, with 463 patients from Laibin City People's Hospital for external validation. Seven ML algorithms were systematically compared, with Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) ultimately selected as the optimal framework. Model performance was rigorously assessed through area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) analysis, calibration curves, Brier scores, and decision curve analysis. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) methodology was employed for feature interpretation. Results: The LightGBM model demonstrated exceptional discrimination with AUROCs of 0.9931 (95% CI: 0.9883-0.998) in the training cohort and 0.9429 (95% CI: 0.9176-0.9682) in external validation. Calibration curves revealed strong prediction-actual outcome concordance (Brier score=0.139). SHAP analysis identified 13 key predictors, with age (mean SHAP value=0.216) and CA19-9 (mean SHAP value=0.198) as dominant contributors. Other significant variables included hematological parameters (WBC, RBC, HGB, PLT), biochemical markers (ALT, TP, ALB, UREA, uric acid), and gender. A clinically implementable web-based risk calculator was successfully developed for real-time probability estimation. Conclusions: Our LightGBM-based model achieves high predictive accuracy while maintaining clinical interpretability, effectively bridging the gap between complex ML systems and practical clinical decision-making. The identified biomarker panel provides biological insights into CRC pathogenesis. This tool shows significant potential for optimizing early diagnosis and personalized risk assessment in CRC management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.