Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40746488›Full record

ArticleTranslational animal science2025

Pens of commercial feedlot cattle with better health and performance have lower estimated greenhouse gas emissions intensity.

T B McAtee, D G Renter, N B Betts, N Cernicchiaro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

T B McAteeCenter for Outcomes Research and Epidemiology, Department of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, Kansas State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
D G RenterCenter for Outcomes Research and Epidemiology, Department of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, Kansas State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9959-0674
N B BettsElanco Animal Health, Greenfield, IN 46140, USA.
N CernicchiaroCenter for Outcomes Research and Epidemiology, Department of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, Kansas State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8649-6470

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With increasing emphasis on sustainability, beef producers are evaluating potential environmental impacts of production practices. However, gaps remain in understanding how cattle health and performance metrics align with environmental impacts and global protein needs. This study quantified how feedlot performance and health metrics for beef-breed steers and heifers are associated with total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and emissions per unit of production. Using data on 9,436 single-lot pens in nine U.S. commercial feedlots (2017 to 2021), we fit mixed-effects multivariable models, based on directed acyclic graphs, to evaluate four key explanatory variables: average daily gain (ADG), feed efficiency (G:F), medicine costs per pen (proxy for disease burden), and cumulative mortality. Sex, season of arrival, days on feed, and arrival body weight were assessed as potential confounders. The primary outcome was estimated carbon dioxide equivalent emissions per kg of final body weight (emissions intensity), derived from Uplook 1.0 (Elanco Animal Health). Across all study pens, 19.2% of estimated lifetime emissions occurred during the feedlot phase, while 41.8% of total body weight gain occurred at the feedlot; demonstrating how feedlots reduce emissions intensity and enhance production efficiency. Higher ADG and G:F were associated with lower emissions intensity, while higher mortality and disease burden were linked to increased emissions intensity. Significant interactions were observed in all models, with effects of ADG and G:F modified by sex and season (

Indexed as

beef cattleefficiencyemissions intensitysustainability

Identifiers

PMID40746488
PMCPMC12311931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.