ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025
Comparative evaluation of pushout bond strength of three different sealers: An
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of postoperative pain after the use of calcium silicate bioceramic sealer - BioRoot RCS: A double-blinded randomized clinical trial.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation sealing ability: Bioceramic versus resin-based sealers by micro-CT analysis.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Pushout bond strength evaluation determines the efficiency of sealer which provides better adaptation, sealing ability, and complete fluid-tight hermetic seal, thereby preventing the entry of microorganisms and reinfection. Aim: The study aimed to evaluate the pushout bond strength of the teeth obturated with bioceramic gutta-percha coated with AH Plus, CeraSeal, and BioRoot RCS sealer. Settings and Design: This was an Subjects and Methods: Sixty human mandibular premolar teeth with single roots were decoronated to provide 15 mm length. Instrumentation was done using the Micro Mega Hero Shaper Gold Rotary Files till F3. Canals were irrigated with 5.25% NaOCl, 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid solution, and saline and dried. Samples were divided into three groups: Group I ( Statistical Analysis: Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni Results: Analysis using ANOVA showed a statistically significant difference ( Conclusion: BioRoot RCS sealer showed better pushout bond strength values when compared to CeraSeal sealer and AH Plus sealer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.