ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025
An
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcome of an Extensive Mid-Root Perforation With Unintentional Bioceramic Extrusion: A Case Report With 2-Year Recall Using CBCT.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
- Repair of furcal perforations using different calcium silicate cements: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The current research aimed to gauge the sealing ability using dye penetration and stereomicroscope and marginal adaptation under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) for various furcation repair materials, namely Bio-C Repair, MTA Angelus, GC Fuji VII, and TheraCal LC. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare and evaluate four furcation repair materials for their sealing ability and marginal adaptation. Materials and Methods: Seventy mandibular molars with nonfused and well-developed roots were selected, and a comparison between four furcation repair materials, namely MTA Angelus, Bio-C Repair, GC Fiji VII, and TheraCal LC, was done. In the first group, 50 samples were tested for sealing ability using the dye penetration method and stereomicroscope, and in the second group, 20 samples were studied for marginal adaptation using SEM. Results: The mean value of microleakage for the Bio-C Repair was the lowest, whereas the mean value for the control group was found to be highest among all materials used. MTA Angelus had a mean value between the Bio-C Repair and GC Fuji VII. The multiple intergroup comparisons showed significant differences between all the subgroups in terms of marginal adaptation. Furthermore, the highest marginal gap values were found in the TheraCal group among all the experimental groups. Bio-C Repair showed the lowest gap formation as compared to all other tested materials. Conclusion: Bio-C Repair and MTA Angelus are good furcation repair materials. Clinical Significance: Furcation perforations from endodontic treatment can jeopardize prognosis by damaging periodontal fibers and potentially causing tooth loss. Opting for a biocompatible furcation repair material enhances the effectiveness of treatment and promotes better healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.