ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2025
Could the sealer thickness affect the filling ability of bioceramic endodontic materials? Evaluation in a simulated physiological condition.
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sample size calculation practices in original research articles of the Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics (2021-2025).Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- Physical and surface analysis of calcium silicate Clinker after acid challenge: a micro-CT and SEM study.Brazilian oral research · 2026Article
- Effect of F18 Bioactive Glass-Treated Gutta-Percha on Interaction with Endodontic Sealers.Brazilian dental journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Bioceramic sealers must provide filling and dimensional stability over time. Aims: To evaluate by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), the effect of sealer thickness on the physical properties of Bio-C Sealer (BCS) and BioRoot RCS (BR) after immersion in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 7 and 30 days. Materials and Methods: Extracted bovine teeth were prepared with ProDesign Logic 40/0.05, and the last 4-mm apical of the roots was sectioned. Then, the specimens were filled using the single-cone technique with BCS or BR ( Statistical Analysis Used: ANOVA/Tukey, paired, and unpaired t-tests were performed (α =0.05). Results: Sealer thickness did not influence the filling capacity in all conditions tested. After 7 days, BR had a higher volume loss than BCS, with no influence of the sealer thickness. The volumetric loss and percentage of interface gaps were higher for both sealers with GT from 7 to 30 days of immersion. BR with GT showed a higher presence of interface gaps compared to the other groups in all the experimental periods. Conclusions: GT negatively influences the volumetric change and presence of gaps in the material/dentin interface, especially for BR. Both materials demonstrate adequate filling ability regardless of the sealer thickness used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.