Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40746454›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

A mixed-methods exploration of social networks, self-efficacy, and life satisfaction in rural Chinese high schools.

Ping Zhu, Tingting Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ping Zhu *Graduate School of Education, Daejin University, Pocheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Tingting Wang *Weifang University of Science and Technology, Weifang, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This mixed-methods study explored how social networks influence academic self-efficacy and life satisfaction among rural Chinese high school students. Methods: The study involved 454 students in the quantitative phase, utilizing the Social Network Index (SNI), Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES), and Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). The qualitative phase included interviews with 28 students. Results: Quantitative results revealed that network centrality ( Discussion: These findings emphasize the dual role of social networks in fostering academic confidence and life satisfaction while also introducing competitive stressors. This is particularly relevant in rural contexts where family support is crucial. Implications include the need to promote supportive peer relationships and mitigate the negative effects of competition.

Indexed as

academic self-efficacyfamily supportlife satisfactionnarrative inquiryrural studentssocial capitalsocial networks

Identifiers

PMID40746454
PMCPMC12312638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.