ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
Comparative analysis of machine learning techniques in metabolomic-based preterm birth prediction.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Machine learning (ML), with advancements in algorithms and computations, is seeing an increased presence in life science research. This study investigated several ML models' efficacy in predicting preterm birth using untargeted metabolomics from serum collected during the third trimester of gestation. Methods: Samples from 48 preterm and 102 term delivery mothers from the All Our Families Cohort (Calgary, AB) were examined. Four ML algorithms: Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA), linear logistic regression, artificial neural networks (ANN), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) - with and without bootstrap resampling were used to examine the small-scale clinical dataset for both model performance and metabolite interpretation. Results: Model performance was evaluated based on confusion matrices, area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve analysis, and feature importance rankings. Linear models such as PLS-DA and logistic regression demonstrated moderate classification performance (AUROC ≈ 0.60), whereas non-linear approaches, including ANN and XGBoost, exhibited marginal improvements. Among all models, XGBoost combined with bootstrap resampling achieved the highest performance, yielding an AUROC of 0.85 (95 % CI: 0.57-0.99, p < 0.001), indicating a significant improvement in classification accuracy. Metabolite importance, derived from Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), consistently identified acylcarnitines and amino acid derivatives as principal discriminative features. Pathway analysis revealed disruptions to tyrosine metabolism as well as phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesis to be associated with preterm delivery. Conclusions: Our results highlight the complexity of metabolomics-based modelling for preterm birth and support an iterative, model-driven approach for optimizing predictive accuracy in small-scale clinical datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.