ReviewRheumatology advances in practice2025
Refining lupus management: a comprehensive review of HCQ blood levels.
Review in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Increasing the utilisation of hydroxychloroquine blood level testing in lupus: a quality improvement project.Lupus science & medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
HCQ is a cornerstone therapy for SLE, offering critical benefits in disease management, including improved survival, reduced flare risks and decreased organ damage. Significant variability in HCQ blood levels among patients challenges the efficacy of traditional weight-based dosing and highlights the need for individualized treatment strategies. We conducted a comprehensive review of peer-reviewed studies across multiple databases to synthesize current evidence on factors influencing HCQ pharmacokinetics, optimal timing and frequency of testing, matrix selection and interpretation of results. While further research is needed to refine HCQ monitoring strategies, this review summarizes the most up-to-date evidence. HCQ blood concentrations may be influenced by patient weight, kidney function and cytochrome P450 genetic polymorphisms. Whole blood is the preferred matrix for measurement, offering greater accuracy than serum or plasma. Testing should be performed no earlier than 6 months after treatment initiation, with trough levels being ideal, though random levels remain acceptable in clinical practice. Whole blood concentrations <200 ng/ml indicate severe nonadherence, while levels between 200 and 750 ng/ml suggest partial nonadherence. A therapeutic target range of 750-1200 ng/ml is associated with improved disease control, and levels >1200 ng/ml may increase the risk of retinal toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.