Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40746405›Full record

ReviewRheumatology advances in practice2025

Refining lupus management: a comprehensive review of HCQ blood levels.

Zeinab F Saleh, J Michelle Kahlenberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zeinab F SalehDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9474-8516
J Michelle KahlenbergDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4006-8945

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HCQ is a cornerstone therapy for SLE, offering critical benefits in disease management, including improved survival, reduced flare risks and decreased organ damage. Significant variability in HCQ blood levels among patients challenges the efficacy of traditional weight-based dosing and highlights the need for individualized treatment strategies. We conducted a comprehensive review of peer-reviewed studies across multiple databases to synthesize current evidence on factors influencing HCQ pharmacokinetics, optimal timing and frequency of testing, matrix selection and interpretation of results. While further research is needed to refine HCQ monitoring strategies, this review summarizes the most up-to-date evidence. HCQ blood concentrations may be influenced by patient weight, kidney function and cytochrome P450 genetic polymorphisms. Whole blood is the preferred matrix for measurement, offering greater accuracy than serum or plasma. Testing should be performed no earlier than 6 months after treatment initiation, with trough levels being ideal, though random levels remain acceptable in clinical practice. Whole blood concentrations <200 ng/ml indicate severe nonadherence, while levels between 200 and 750 ng/ml suggest partial nonadherence. A therapeutic target range of 750-1200 ng/ml is associated with improved disease control, and levels >1200 ng/ml may increase the risk of retinal toxicity.

Indexed as

HCQ blood levelSLE

Identifiers

PMID40746405
PMCPMC12313017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.