Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40746399›Full record

ArticleEco-Environment & Health2025

Quantitative analysis of PBAT microplastics and their degradation products in soil by mass spectrometry.

Zhuyao Hua, Ya Li, Xin He, Fengxiao Zhu, Sha Chang, Jijie Kong, Changyin Zhu, Chao Wang, Shiyin Li, Huan He and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eco-Environment & Health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zhuyao HuaSchool of Environment, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China.
Ya LiSchool of Environment, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China.
Xin HeSchool of Environment, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China.
Fengxiao ZhuSchool of Environment, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China.
Sha ChangSchool of Environment, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China.
Jijie KongSchool of Environment, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China.
Changyin ZhuCo-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Chao WangKey Laboratory of Environmental Remediation and Ecological Health of Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Jiangsu Province Ecology and Environment Protection Engineering Research Center of Groundwater Pollution Prevention and Control, Jiangsu Environmental Engineering Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210019, China.
Shiyin LiSchool of Environment, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China.
Huan HeSchool of Environment, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China.
Cheng GuState Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global production of biodegradable plastics is increasing, but the degradation behavior of microplastics derived from these items in soil is still scarcely reported. In this study, a method for quantifying soil poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT) microplastics was developed, and their degradation behavior in three different soils was investigated. PBAT was quantified by analyzing the content of the monomer terephthalic acid (TPA) released during thermally assisted alkali hydrolysis, using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). For alkali hydrolysis, the use of capped bottle, water bath (90 ​°C for 30 ​min), and ultrasonication (100 ​kHz for 15 ​min) allowed for high-throughput sample processing in comparison to the use of round-bottom flask, reflux condenser, and stirring heating mantle. After 150 days, 10.8%-11.0% of PBAT microplastics were degraded in the acidic and neutral soils, while 17.1% were degraded in the alkaline soil, in line with the greatest lipase activity changes in the alkaline soil. This may be due to the fact that alkaline conditions favor initial depolymerization of PBAT, facilitating subsequent microbial attack. PBAT degradation products were also monitored, using solvent extraction combined with LC-MS and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis. It was found that butanediol (up to 1580 ​μg/kg) accumulated to a higher level than TPA (about 50 ​μg/kg), especially in acidic and alkaline soils. Overall, this study, for the first time, precisely quantified the degradation of PBAT microplastics in soil. Further study is needed to better understand the fate of biodegradable microplastics in the soil environment and whether they will persist.

Indexed as

MetaboliteMicroplasticsPBATQuantificationSoil

Identifiers

PMID40746399
PMCPMC12311499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.