Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40746328›Full record

ArticleAustralian journal of psychology2025

Adult Hope Scale: validation in older adults.

Kate Labrosciano, Jillian Dorrian, Braam Lowies, Roslyn Russell, Kurt Lushington

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australian journal of psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07473505 (Integrative Bilateral Cervical Sympathetic Blocks for Trauma-Related Symptoms in Special Operations Veterans), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07473505 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Integrative Bilateral Cervical Sympathetic Blocks for Trauma-Related Symptoms in Special Operations Veterans: A Prospective Case Series.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorReset Medical and Wellness CenterRan2026 to 2027Enrolled75ConditionsPTSD, Trauma-related Mental Health Symptoms, Moral Injury, AnxietyArmsstellate ganglion block with 0.5% ropivacaine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kate LabroscianoBehaviour-Brain-Body Research Centre, Justice and Society Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8237-524X
Jillian DorrianBehaviour-Brain-Body Research Centre, Justice and Society Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6485-1643
Braam LowiesBusiness Unit, City West Campus, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1076-8537
Roslyn RussellRoslyn Russell School of Economics, Finance and Marketing, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0578-8119
Kurt LushingtonBehaviour-Brain-Body Research Centre, Justice and Society Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8371-273X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The Adult Hope Scale (AHS) is a widely used measure of hope and is reported to contain two distinct but interrelated constructs of agency (motivation to achieve goals) and pathways (planning routes to goals). Hope is thought to play a key role in the wellbeing of older people and while the AHS has been validated in young/middle-aged adults, the factor structure remains to be tested in older adults. Method: Using computer-assisted personal communication, the AHS was completed by 1454 older Australians (726 F, age (mean (sd)) = 66.4 (5.81) y, range 55-84 y) stratified according to gender, location (metropolitan vs non-metropolitan), retirement status (yes/no) and age (55-65 vs 65 + y). Dimensionality was tested by (i) bifactor modelling (one-factor, two-factor and a bifactor model with a general factor, Hope, and two specific factors, Agency and Pathways) and (ii) exploratory graph analysis (which uses community detection algorithms to cluster variables into factors). Cross-gender invariance was also tested. Hope scores were compared between demographics and wellbeing (i.e. WHO-5 mental wellbeing and positive/negative coping questionnaire) groupings. Results: Both bifactor modelling and exploratory graph analysis reveal that the AHS is unidimensional. Gender was shown to be invariant. Hope scores were comparable between demographic groupings, but higher scores were observed in older adults with higher mental wellbeing and positive coping with effect sizes in the small to medium range. Conclusions: This study confirms that the AHS is a unidimensional scale and can be used to reliably measure hope in older Australian men and women.

Indexed as

AHSfactor analysisHopeolder adultsvalidation

Identifiers

PMID40746328
PMCPMC12312140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.