ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025
Evaluation of protein extraction methodologies on bacterial proteomic profiling: a comparative analysis.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Auxin (Indole-3-acetic acid) modulation of quorum sensing enhances phage susceptibility in Klebsiella pneumoniae.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Article
- Bacterial Biomolecules Drive Extracellular DNA Adsorption onto Ferrihydrite: Interfacial Interactions and Spectroscopic Insights.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2026Article
- Pleiotropic roles of the MATE transporter CD20030 inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial proteomics is a pivotal tool for elucidating microbial physiology and pathogenicity. The efficiency and reliability of proteomic analyses are highly dependent on the protein extraction methodology, which directly influences the detectable proteome. In this study, we systematically compared four protein extraction protocols-SDT lysis buffer with boiling (SDT-B), SDT lysis buffer with ultrasonication (SDT-U/S), a combination of boiling and ultrasonication (SDT-B-U/S), and SDT lysis buffer with liquid nitrogen grinding followed by ultrasonication (SDT-LNG-U/S)-to evaluate their effects on peptide and protein identification, distribution, and reproducibility in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.