Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40746121›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of oral sciences2025

Reflections on the implications of the trends in dental status for trends in dental care utilization 2001-2021 among adult Danes.

Vibeke Baelum, Rodrigo Lopez, Eero Raittio

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of oral sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vibeke BaelumDepartment of Dentistry and Oral Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2195-8053
Rodrigo LopezCenter for Translational Oral Research - Periodontology, Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6170-507X
Eero RaittioDepartment of Dentistry and Oral Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9258-9355

Funding

Aarhus University Research Foundation #AUFF-E 2019-7-3Danish Rheumatism Association #R171-A5894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to explore trends in dental status and utilization of dental care services over time and to assess the relationship between dental service utilization and dental status among adult Danes aged 20+ years. A register-based cohort study linked individual-level information on dental services received, age, gender, municipality/region, highest completed education, socioeconomic position, income, and immigrant/descendant status for each calendar year in the period 1990-2021. Also included were data reported by dentists since 2001 on number of teeth present, number of teeth with decay, and number of teeth with fillings for 25-, 40-, and 65-year-old patients. About 58% of all adults had used the dental health care system in 2021, less than that seen in previous decades. Non-users were younger, male, had lower income, lower education, lower socioeconomic position, and were immigrants or descendants. Dental attendance has substantially reduced over time among age groups younger than 70 years but increased among the older age groups. Considerable improvements in dental health were noted, with greater tooth retention, fewer caries, and fewer filled teeth in the indicator age groups since 2001. The findings suggest a need for redistribution of resources for oral health care to target vulnerable subgroups carrying larger disease burdens.

Indexed as

Dental CareOral HealthAdultAgedCohort StudiesDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedScandinavians and Nordic PeopleSocioeconomic FactorsYoung Adultdental health servicesepidemiologyhealth care researchregistry dataroutinely collected data

Identifiers

PMID40746121
PMCPMC12445818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.