ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2025
Cost-effectiveness analysis of MRA screening for cerebral aneurysms in Black and Hispanic women: A high risk population.
Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundUnruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) are dilations of major brain arteries, affecting 3% to 5% of adults globally. Prior studies have identified women of Black race and/or Hispanic ethnicity as a high-risk population for UIAs. The clinical utility of early identification and treatment of UIAs is well established, however the economic impact of standardized screening protocols remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) screening for UIAs in this high risk population of patients aged 40 to 80 years, hypothesizing that such screening would be beneficial and cost-effective.Materials and methodsA Markov decision analytic model was used to compare various MRA screening frequencies against no screening for UIAs. Clinical and cost parameters were obtained from literature, focusing on the target population. The model computed quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for different screening strategies.ResultsAll screening strategies increased QALYs compared to no screening. Single screening at age 40 provided the highest QALY gain (+0.79) with the lowest ICER ($2052.27). More frequent screenings yielded higher costs without proportionate QALY gains. Sensitivity analysis indicated that MRA cost and UIA prevalence had the greatest impact on ICER.ConclusionMRA screening for UIAs in non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic female patients is cost-effective, particularly with a single screening at age 40. This strategy improves health outcomes and provides the best cost-effectiveness ratio, supporting its implementation for high-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.