ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2025
Comparative analysis of outcome-associated factors following endovascular treatment for intracranial atherosclerotic disease and cardioembolism: A subanalysis of the K-NET registry.
Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanical Thrombectomy for Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion with Accessory Middle Cerebral Artery: A Case Report.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2026Article
- Comparison of endovascular treatment outcomes in stroke patients with cardioembolic or intracranial atherosclerosis-predisposed large vessel occlusion.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundThe efficacy of endovascular treatment (EVT) for intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) remains unclear. This study compared procedural and clinical outcomes of EVT for ICAD-related and cardiogenic embolism (CE)-related large vessel occlusion (LVO) using data from the Kanagawa Intravenous and Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke registry, a prospective, multicenter observational study.MethodsOf 3187 EVTs from 2018 to 2021, 2047 anterior circulation occlusions included 305 ICAD and 1742 CE cases. The primary endpoint was favorable functional outcome (mRS 0-2) at 90 days; secondary endpoints included recanalization rates, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and puncture-to-recanalization time.ResultsICAD-LVO patients were younger, had lower NIHSS scores, and showed a lower proportion of recanalization (74% vs. 91%,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.