ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2025
Working Together to Deliver Person-Centred Care Within the Stepped Care Model: An Australian Multidisciplinary Perspective.
Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transforming public mental health: a review on global trends, challenges, and pathways to change.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026Review
- Working Together to Deliver Person-Centred Care Within the Stepped Care Model: An Australian Multidisciplinary Perspective.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Australian stepped care model (SCM) in primary mental healthcare aims to provide a structured, accessible and flexible approach to addressing mental health issues. This study, a subset of a broader study, explores the perspectives of multidisciplinary mental health professionals on the implementation and effectiveness of the SCM. Using an exploratory descriptive qualitative methodology, the study collected data from nine participants: mental health nurses, an occupational therapist, a psychologist, a social worker, psychiatrists and a care coordinator, all involved in an SCM. Ethical approval was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee (de-identified for review), and measures were implemented to ensure the privacy and confidentiality of all participants. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews and analysed using reflective thematic analysis. Four main themes were developed from the reflexive thematic analysis: working together to deliver collaborative care, a flexible and personalised approach, complexities of navigating the model and stories of success: positive client outcomes. The multidisciplinary nature of the SCM facilitates a holistic approach to mental healthcare, ensuring comprehensive support for patients. However, workforce shortages and systemic issues present significant challenges. The study found that flexibility and personalisation allow the SCM to adapt to diverse patient needs, which enhances outcomes and satisfaction, though inconsistencies in service delivery remain. Navigating the SCM is complex, requiring better coordination and more precise guidelines to ensure smooth transitions between care levels. Despite these challenges, the SCM has demonstrated considerable success in improving patient outcomes. In conclusion, the SCM represents a promising primary mental healthcare approach, emphasising tailored, multidisciplinary care. The study highlights the need for continuous improvements which include addressing workforce shortages and enhancing coordination to maximise the SCM's impact and ensure sustainable mental health services in Australia. Future research with larger samples and quantitative data is recommended to evaluate further the SCM's effectiveness in Australia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.