Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40745982›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2025

Working Together to Deliver Person-Centred Care Within the Stepped Care Model: An Australian Multidisciplinary Perspective.

Shingai Mareya, Lin Zhao, Mimmie Claudine Watts, Michael Olasoji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Transforming public mental health: a review on global trends, challenges, and pathways to change.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shingai MareyaFederation University Australia, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8962-4107
Lin ZhaoRMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9734-6080
Mimmie Claudine WattsFederation University Australia, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5980-6402
Michael OlasojiFederation University Australia, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2919-6580

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Australian stepped care model (SCM) in primary mental healthcare aims to provide a structured, accessible and flexible approach to addressing mental health issues. This study, a subset of a broader study, explores the perspectives of multidisciplinary mental health professionals on the implementation and effectiveness of the SCM. Using an exploratory descriptive qualitative methodology, the study collected data from nine participants: mental health nurses, an occupational therapist, a psychologist, a social worker, psychiatrists and a care coordinator, all involved in an SCM. Ethical approval was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee (de-identified for review), and measures were implemented to ensure the privacy and confidentiality of all participants. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews and analysed using reflective thematic analysis. Four main themes were developed from the reflexive thematic analysis: working together to deliver collaborative care, a flexible and personalised approach, complexities of navigating the model and stories of success: positive client outcomes. The multidisciplinary nature of the SCM facilitates a holistic approach to mental healthcare, ensuring comprehensive support for patients. However, workforce shortages and systemic issues present significant challenges. The study found that flexibility and personalisation allow the SCM to adapt to diverse patient needs, which enhances outcomes and satisfaction, though inconsistencies in service delivery remain. Navigating the SCM is complex, requiring better coordination and more precise guidelines to ensure smooth transitions between care levels. Despite these challenges, the SCM has demonstrated considerable success in improving patient outcomes. In conclusion, the SCM represents a promising primary mental healthcare approach, emphasising tailored, multidisciplinary care. The study highlights the need for continuous improvements which include addressing workforce shortages and enhancing coordination to maximise the SCM's impact and ensure sustainable mental health services in Australia. Future research with larger samples and quantitative data is recommended to evaluate further the SCM's effectiveness in Australia.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesPatient Care TeamPatient-Centered CareAttitude of Health PersonnelAustraliaHumansPsychiatric NursingQualitative Researchmental health consumermental health servicemental health workforcemultidisciplinary collaborationprimary mental healthcarestepped care model

Identifiers

PMID40745982
PMCPMC12314473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.