Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40745971›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2025

Implementation of a Sensory Room in a Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Suzanne Dawson, Amy Hawke, Lemma Bulto, Patricia Whitelaw, Ngoni Jeranyama, Justin Newton Scanlan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Suzanne DawsonCaring Future Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7357-625X
Amy HawkeSouthern Adelaide Local Health Network, Repat Health Precinct, Daw Park, South Australia, Australia.
Lemma BultoCaring Future Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9528-5595
Patricia WhitelawSouthern Adelaide Local Health Network, Repat Health Precinct, Daw Park, South Australia, Australia.
Ngoni JeranyamaSouthern Adelaide Local Health Network, Repat Health Precinct, Daw Park, South Australia, Australia.
Justin Newton ScanlanFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5639-6476

Funding

Flinders FoundationHospital Research Foundation Group
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory rooms provide a safe space for consumers in inpatient psychiatric settings to self-manage distress and agitation and potentially reduce the use of restrictive practices. However, sensory rooms are often not available, and there is limited knowledge about strategies that support the implementation. This study explored consumer and clinician experiences of a sensory room in an acute psychiatric intensive care unit (PICU) and examined its impacts on restrictive practice use (seclusion and Pro re nata [PRN] medication). A mixed-methods approach was employed in the analysis of interviews with consumers and clinicians and routinely collected data pertaining to restrictive practice use. Themes were generated from the qualitative data through deductive analysis against the Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) and COM-B to understand the barriers and facilitators to use. Rates of PRN use and seclusion were calculated for three 2-month periods: prior to the implementation of the room and two time points following implementation. Prominent barriers related to limited opportunity to use the room due to the environmental context (room location) and resources (staffing). Facilitators were clustered around consumer and staff motivation to use the room. There were no significant changes in PRN use over time, and while there was a numeric decrease in the use of seclusion, this did not reach statistical significance. In summary, sensory rooms were valued by consumers and most staff and were considered to provide a safe therapeutic space within the often chaotic and complex treatment environment of a PICU. Strategies for successful implementation are discussed.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsMental DisordersPsychiatric Department, HospitalAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Isolationcomfort roomimplementationpsychiatric intensive care unitsensory approachessensory room

Identifiers

PMID40745971
PMCPMC12314344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.