ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2025
Safety for Recovery During Admission to Acute Mental Health Hospitals: A Constructivist Grounded Theory Study to Support Safety-Focused Recovery-Oriented Care in the Context of Risk Management Constraints.
Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safety for Recovery During Admission to Acute Mental Health Hospitals: A Constructivist Grounded Theory Study to Support Safety-Focused Recovery-Oriented Care in the Context of Risk Management Constraints.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recovery during admission to acute mental health hospitals can involve supporting individuals in beginning to work towards a fulfilling life despite experiencing mental distress. This can help reduce risks such as suicide and aggression. However, restrictive risk management practices, such as physical restraint may increase during this period, and the distress caused by these practices can hinder a person's abilities to understand their recovery needs. Little is known about how recovery can occur safely within the context of such risk management restrictions. Therefore, this constructivist grounded theory study explored the perspectives of 15 individuals with hospital admission experiences about how they might begin their recovery journeys amidst these constraints. The study found that people could reconnect with their beliefs about a fulfilling life vicariously through interpersonal relationships. This facilitated a sense-making process allowing individuals to better understand their recovery needs which were otherwise obscured by the complexity and intrusiveness of risk management practices. The theory comprised of four social processes: 'treating me safely,' when nurses began to understand those admitted as individuals; 'outside world inside,' which involved nurses helping the person to form meaningful connections to their personal world; 'tangible hopefulness,' where nurses raised the person's awareness of meaningful successes; and 'scaffolding recovery,' which built on the previous three processes, with the nurses helping individuals recognise the potential for working towards a fulfilling life. The study shows how supporting a relational approach to care may lessen people feeling unsafe when admitted to hospital, despite experiencing potentially distressing risk management practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.