ReviewMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2025
Advancing CAR-T cell therapy: Insights into patient biology, leukapheresis, and cryopreservation.
Review in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of cryopreservation on PBMC-derived CAR-T cell manufacturing outcomes: a systematic review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Advancing In Vivo Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Engineering to Accelerate Clinical Translation.MedComm · 2026Review
- Redefining the role of the transfusion medicine physician in the era of advanced cellular therapies.Transfusion · 2026Review
- Are we there yet? The road to faster and more efficient CAR T cell manufacturing.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- T cell dysfunction associated with repeated CAR-T cell manufacturing failure following prolonged bispecific antibody exposure: a case report.Leukemia research reports · 2026Article
- Microbiota-derived metabolic priming of CAR-T cell fitness: a translational framework for next-generation cell therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Immunotherapy in multiple myeloma: advances from immune microenvironment insights to clinical application.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Commercial chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells are manufactured from autologous patient-derived leukapheresis starting material. The quality and characteristics of the leukapheresis starting material has been identified as a potential root cause of manufacturing failure in autologous CAR-T cell products. Unsuccessful CAR-T production constitutes not only an obstacle for treatment, but also presents several hurdles for patients, healthcare providers, and CAR-T manufacturers. In this literature review, we describe published factors that might affect the quality of autologous leukapheresis starting materials. We characterize patient-related factors such as cancer treatments and washout periods prior to collection, disease status, and clinical/laboratory findings and their impact on the leukapheresis cell composition. Factors relating to the leukapheresis procedure, including cell collection procedures, current best practices and guidelines, nurse experience, and challenges, are also addressed. Next, cryopreservation prior to manufacturing is discussed in relation to timing, cryoprotectants, concentration, cooling rates, and cellular stability. Last, gaps in knowledge and future directions are presented for each of these arguments. Our thorough literature assessment can support discussions for process optimization, reducing manufacturing failures, and long-term harmonization practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.