ArticleDiagnostic pathology2025
Enhancing preanalytic surgical specimen management: experience of a system implementation initiative.
Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND /
objectivesPreanalytic quality control of surgical specimens is often inadequately managed. This study aimed to share the experience of improving quality through the implementation of a system for preanalytic surgical specimens.
methodsAfter initial workflow mapping and process optimization, a pathology specimen transfer system was piloted and subsequently implemented hospital-wide. Ongoing monitoring and adjustments were made based on established standards and operational needs. Data were analyzed using R Studio software.
resultsThe system reduced errors from 24.82 to 2.40%, including reductions of 86.85% in requisition mistakes, 95.30% in label errors, and 100% in illegible handwriting. From 2020 to 2023, the interval between specimen removal and submission was halved, and delayed fixation decreased from 0.46 to 0.22%.
conclusionsThe system effectively standardized processes, enhanced efficiency, and reduced errors in preanalytic surgical specimens. Quality improvement was dependent on thorough workflow mapping and optimization, as well as ongoing monitoring and adjustments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.