Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40745620›Full record

ArticleConflict and health2025

Expanding the evidence on integration of cash assistance in gender-based violence case management in humanitarian settings: lessons learned from multi-country evaluations.

Emily Lyles, Nancy Glass, Elisabeth Sidabutar, Erika Garcia Roa, Carlos Hoyos, Andrea Pacheco, Diana Sarria, Alice Golay, Joanna Friedman, Eleonora Argenti and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conflict and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Emily LylesJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Humanitarian Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Nancy GlassJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Humanitarian Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. nglass1@jhu.edu.
Elisabeth SidabutarUNFPA Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Erika Garcia RoaUNFPA Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Carlos HoyosUNFPA Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Andrea PachecoUNFPA Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Diana SarriaUNFPA Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Alice GolayUNFPA Jordan Office, Amman, Jordan.
Joanna FriedmanUNFPA Jordan Office, Amman, Jordan.
Eleonora ArgentiUNFPA Jordan Office, Amman, Jordan.
Madeline MadaniUNFPA Jordan Office, Amman, Jordan.
Pamela Di CamilloUNFPA Humanitarian Office, Geneva, Switzerland.
Giada CicognolaUNFPA Humanitarian Office, Geneva, Switzerland.
Elena BertolaUNFPA Humanitarian Office, Geneva, Switzerland.
Shannon DoocyJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Humanitarian Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of cash assistance in humanitarian emergencies has increased rapidly with positive outcomes across multiple objectives, including in health and protection. The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) is leading efforts to integrate cash assistance in Gender-Based Violence (GBV) response programs to achieve and improve protection outcomes for GBV survivors. The cash assistance within case management program was piloted in three humanitarian contexts, Colombia, Jordan and Indonesia. An evaluation of the pilots was conducted to provide a comprehensive understanding of the impacts of cash assistance within the case management process on safety, referrals and service uptake, and health.

methodsQuasi-experimental pre-post designs were developed for the evaluations in partnership with UNFPA, country teams (Jordan, Colombia, Indonesia) and implementing partners in locations impacted by conflict and/or natural disasters and where UNFPA had ongoing GBV programming.

resultsCash assistance is an important additional resource for GBV case management programs by contributing to improvement in safety, uptake of referral services, mental health and household relationships for GBV survivors, specifically lowering women’s symptoms of depression in three diverse humanitarian settings. In all three countries, most women receiving the cash assistance reported feeling safe in their homes. Further, women who received the cash assistance for up to six months reported improved household relationships and fewer symptoms of depression compared to women who had cash assistance for one to three months. The findings demonstrated that cash assistance within case management, as based on GBV survivors’ case action plans and safety plans, can be implemented safely and does not appear to increase women’s risk of harm.

conclusionsThe evaluation of the pilot programs found that cash assistance integrated into GBV case management, delivered by trained caseworkers, provides an opportunity for referrals and uptake of services, reduces feelings of depression for women and girls experiencing violence or at risk for violence and proves to be a valuable option in diverse humanitarian contexts. However, cash assistance (one-off and up to 6 months recurrent assistance), which can serve to meet immediate life-saving needs and medium-term needs, can be insufficient at times to meet the ongoing needs of survivors, depending on the GBV survivors’ case action plan and the support needed for them to reach their specific goals. Therefore, research on programs that provide longer-term access to cash assistance within case management in humanitarian settings is important to expand upon the learning from the UNFPA-led pilot programs in Jordan, Colombia and Indonesia.

Indexed as

Case managementCash assistanceGender based violenceHumanitarian emergencyMental health and safety

Identifiers

PMID40745620
PMCPMC12312278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.