Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40745605›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Embedding research into the organisational structure of smaller rural hospitals: building research culture and capacity and understanding perceived rural health workforce benefit.

Laura Alston, Dai Pu, Sarah Wood, Michael Field, Hannah Beks, Olivia A King, Nikita Wheaton, Catherine E Huggins, Anna Wong Shee, Kevin Mc Namara and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Laura AlstonResearch Unit, Colac Area Health, Colac, Australia. laura.alston@deakin.edu.au.
Dai PuSchool of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Sarah WoodDeakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
Michael FieldResearch Unit, Colac Area Health, Colac, Australia.
Hannah BeksDeakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
Olivia A KingDeakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
Nikita WheatonDeakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
Catherine E HugginsSchool of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Anna Wong SheeDeakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
Kevin Mc NamaraDeakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
Vincent L VersaceDeakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

MRFF Rapid Applied Research Translation Grant RARUR000072Rural Health Multidisciplinary Training (RHMT) program from the Department of Health and Aged Care Deakin UniversityWestern Alliance Health Research Research Translation Coorindators
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRural hospitals in Australia have not been afforded the same opportunities for research activity as their metropolitan counterparts. Equitable access to career and research opportunities has been identified as a potential strategy to enhance workforce satisfaction and retention in rural areas. Smaller rural hospitals show potential in being key settings for research; but minimal investment has translated into a lack of action and knowledge. Practical examples of how this can be done from an organisational structure point of view, are limited in the literature.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was undertaken in a rural hospital that services rural communities classed as MM4-5 by the Modified Monash Model. The study utilised the validated Research Capacity and Culture (RCC) tool to assess the impact of a rural hospital research unit on building research capacity and culture. It also explored the association between job satisfaction and research activity among hospital staff. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and linear regression.

resultsSeventy-four staff members completed the survey, with 15 reporting that they had worked with the research unit to complete projects. Among staff who received support from the Research Unit, there were higher RCC scores for 9 out of 20 organisational-level items. Rural hospitals staff rated the benefit of having research opportunities available (mean rating 7 out of 10) in their workplace for future career prospects.

conclusionsThis study provides evidence that the presence of a research unit, as part of the organisational structure, may assist in improving research capacity and culture within the rural hospital setting. It also identified areas for improvement in this context, as scores were not increased across all of the RCC domains and is an area of future development. Rural hospitals staff perceive the availability of a local research unit and research opportunitiestobebeneficialfortheircareer and this has implications for rural health workforce development strategies.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingHealth Services ResearchHospitals, RuralOrganizational CultureAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJob SatisfactionMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesCapacity buildingResearch CultureRural HealthRural Health ServicesRural HospitalsWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID40745605
PMCPMC12312593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.