ArticleBMC neurology2025
Cognitive impairment profile in patients with the m.3243A> G variant in mitochondrial DNA.
Article in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Validation of Digital PCR for Precise m.3243A>G Heteroplasmy Quantification in Early-Onset Diabetes.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe m.3243A>G variant in mitochondrial DNA is associated with a wide spectrum of clinical features ranging from asymptomatic subjects to severely symptomatic patients. Cognitive involvement is one of the clinical features, but its severity and frequency are not properly known. Here we describe neuropsychological features associated with m.3243 A > G.
methodsWe studied 45 adult patients with m.3243 A > G and 45 healthy subjects. Comprehensive neuropsychological test battery was applied. Cognitive impairment was defined, if at least five out of seven cognitive domains were impaired compared to matched controls. Major cognitive impairment was diagnosed, if the impairment was general across the domains.
resultsSixteen patients (36%) with m.3243 A > G were diagnosed with cognitive impairment, and six of them (13%) had a major cognitive impairment. The median age at diagnosis of cognitive impairment was 53 years (range, 25-64). The profile consisted of impaired abstract reasoning, memory problems, motor function defects and executive problems. Executive functions were affected most, and verbal memory was affected the least. Higher variant heteroplasmy and more severe global phenotype were associated with cognitive impairment, whereas age and sex were not.
conclusionCognitive impairment is found frequently in patients with m.3243 A > G, but major cognitive impairment is not common. The impairment affects all neuropsychological domains and no specific profile could be identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.