ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
A brain tumor segmentation enhancement in MRI images using U-Net and transfer learning.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A survey of deep learning techniques in detecting neurological disorders using MRI.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Pooled it
- Quantum-inspired optimization of transformer-capsule networks for accurate brain tumor segmentation and classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- YOLO-LS: a novel deep learning framework for brain tumor segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A deep-learning framework for brain tumor segmentation via three-dimensional mass-preserving geometric transformation.Brain informatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a novel transfer learning approach for segmenting brain tumors in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) images. Using Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) abnormality segmentation masks and MRI scans from The Cancer Genome Atlas's (TCGA's) lower-grade glioma collection, our proposed approach uses a VGG19-based U-Net architecture with fixed pretrained weights. The experimental findings, which show an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.9957, F1-Score of 0.9679, Dice Coefficient of 0.9679, Precision of 0.9541, Recall of 0.9821, and Intersection-over-Union (IoU) of 0.9378, show how effective the proposed framework is. According to these metrics, the VGG19-powered U-Net outperforms not only the conventional U-Net model but also other variants that were compared and used different pre-trained backbones in the U-Net encoder.Clinical trial registrationNot applicable as this study utilized existing publicly available dataset and did not involve a clinical trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.