Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40745560›Full record

ArticleBMC biomedical engineering2025

Applications of machine learning in glaucoma diagnosis based on tabular data: a systematic review.

Mohammad Hasan Shahriari, Farkhondeh Asadi, Hamid Moghaddasi, Arash Roshanpour, Farideh Sharifipour, Zahra Khorrami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohammad Hasan ShahriariDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farkhondeh AsadiDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. asadifar@sbmu.ac.ir.
Hamid MoghaddasiDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. hamidmoghaddasi1969@gmail.com.
Arash RoshanpourDepartment of Computer, Yadegar-e-Imam Khomeini (RAH), Shahre Rey Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Farideh SharifipourOphthalmic Epidemiology Research Center, Research Institute for Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra KhorramiOphthalmic Epidemiology Research Center, Research Institute for Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness, necessitating early and accurate diagnosis to prevent vision loss. Traditional diagnostic methods often suffer from subjectivity and variability, emphasizing the need for more reliable approaches. This study evaluates the application of machine learning (ML) techniques in glaucoma diagnosis, analyzing their effectiveness and identifying the most promising methods and datasets. A systematic review of five major databases was conducted, selecting 35 studies based on predefined criteria. The findings reveal that structured data, including optical coherence tomography (OCT), visual field (VF) tests, and demographic factors, significantly enhance diagnostic accuracy. ML models such as support vector machine (SVM), deep learning (DL), random forest, and ensemble methods demonstrated accuracy ranging from 76 to 98.3%, with AUC values between 52.5% and 99%. Despite these advancements, challenges such as data imbalance and limited sample sizes impact model generalizability. The results highlight the potential of ML to improve glaucoma detection, though further research is needed to enhance data quality and model validation for broader clinical applicability.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDecision support systemDeep learningGlaucomaMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40745560
PMCPMC12315471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.