ArticleBMC oral health2025
Orthodontic treatment improves gingival morphological symmetry parameters: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe pursuit of an aesthetically pleasing smile is closely tied to the symmetry of teeth and gingival morphology, yet the impact of orthodontic treatment on gingival contour symmetry remains underexplored. This study aims to investigate the effects of orthodontic treatment on gingival morphology symmetry.
methodsThis retrospective study includes 50 eligible patients as the experimental group and 50 healthy individuals as the control group. Digital intraoral scans were performed for malocclusion patients both before and after clear aligner treatment, as well as for individuals in the control group. Geomagic Control X software was used to assess quantitative indices affecting gingival morphology and contour symmetry. Specifically, mean deviation distance (MDD) was used to measure the average deviation of gingival points relative to the contralateral gingival contour, root mean square (RMS) to reflect the overall level of deviation across all gingival points, and the percentage within tolerance to indicate the proportion of points falling within the tolerance range. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 24 software, with significance set at P < 0.05. The reproducibility of measurements was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
resultsSignificant statistical differences in gingival contour symmetry measurements were observed within the study group before and after orthodontic treatment. (P < 0.001). Comparisons between the postorthodontic group and the control group revealed no significant differences in most gingival contour symmetry parameters. Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences in the mean changes of MDD and RMS across different tooth positions before and after orthodontic treatment. However, a statistically significant difference was observed in the changes of percentage within tolerance (p = 0.019) across tooth positions before and after orthodontic treatment.
conclusionOrthodontic treatment significantly enhances gingival contour symmetry in patients with mild anterior crowding and skeletal Class I malocclusion. A comparison of the gingival morphology symmetry in the anterior teeth between postorthodontic patients and healthy individuals revealed no statistically significant differences.
trial registrationThis study was approved by the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of Stomatology Hospital of Fujian Medical University (approval no. 2024-14).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.