Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40745473›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2025

A foundational triage system for improving accuracy in moderate acuity level emergency classifications.

Tuo Liu, Yang Gu, Hongyi Chen, Yan Zhang, Leqi Zheng, Xuanqi Huang, Yanjun Xu, Cai Wen, Mansheng Chen, Jiaqi Lin and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Tuo Liu *School of Computer Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yang Gu *Department of Emergency Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Hongyi Chen *School of Computer Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yan Zhang *Department of Emergency Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Leqi ZhengSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xuanqi HuangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yanjun XuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Cai WenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Mansheng ChenSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiaqi LinSchool of Mathematics (Zhuhai), Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3195-6569
Dongguo HuangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Feixia ChenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yulan ZhongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Hui ChenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yanfeng GuoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Guangdong Provincal Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Mei LuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Guangdong Provincal Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Guangwei ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Hao WuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Changdong WangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. wangchd3@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5972-559X
Xiaotu XiThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China. xxttm@gzucm.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-4301-8569
Li LiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. lil3@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Tao YuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. yut@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5012-9353

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTriage is an essential part of Emergency Medicine, which may be assisted by AI models due to limited availability of medical staff. However, AI models for aiding triage have difficulty in identifying levels that are difficult or ambiguous for human clinicians to distinguish. This study aims to develop a more reliable triage model that improves the accuracy of classification, especially for cases with moderate acuity.

methodsWe developed a new triage model called KUTS, a foundational classification model for emergency triage, which leverages a knowledge prompt-tuning encoder and an uncertainty-based classifier. KUTS takes tabular data and chief complaints as input, and then assign different acuity levels to patients based on their condition acuity. We trained and tested the model on multiple real-world emergency department datasets.

resultsHere we show that on the most difficult level for human to distinguish (moderate acuity level), our KUTS substantially outperforms the previous shallow single-modal methods, deep single-modal methods and deep multi-modal methods on AUC score, by an average of 0.19, 0.35, and 0.13 (from 0.76, 0.60, 0.82 to 0.95), respectively. Besides, on all the triage levels, our KUTS also outperforms the previous shallow single-modal methods, deep single-modal methods and deep multi-modal methods on AUC score, by an average of 0.14, 0.20 and 0.06 (from 0.82, 0.76, 0.90 to 0.96), respectively.

conclusionsKUTS provides a foundational framework and paradigm for the study of emergency triage, and facilitates the development of more efficient triage systems.

Identifiers

PMID40745473
PMCPMC12314101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.