Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40745437›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Sexual partner number and distribution over time affect long-term partner evaluation: evidence from 11 countries across 5 continents.

Andrew G Thomas, William Costello, Mons Bendixen, Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair, Menelaos Apostolou, Klára Bártová, Ondřej Burýšek, Rob Lowe, Peter Jonason, Marta Kowal and 11 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Andrew G ThomasSchool of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK. a.g.thomas@swansea.ac.uk.
William CostelloSchool of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Mons BendixenDepartment of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Leif Edward Ottesen KennairDepartment of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Menelaos ApostolouDepartment of Social Sciences, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Klára BártováDepartment of Psychology and Life Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Pátkova, Czechia.
Ondřej BurýšekSchool of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Rob LoweSchool of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Peter JonasonPsychology Research Institute, University of Economics and Human Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Marta KowalIDN Being Human Lab-Institute of Psychology, University of Wrocław, Wroclaw, Poland.
Yago Luksevicius de MoraesDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, Fundação Santo André, Santo André, Brazil.
Jiaqing ODepartment of Psychology, University of Macau, Macau, China.
Piotr SorokowskiInstitute of Psychology, University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland.
Danielle SulikowskiSchool of Psychology, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, Australia.
Zuzana ŠtěrbováDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Jaroslava Varella ValentovaDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Marco Antonio Correa VarellaDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Yan WangDepartment of Psychology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Arnaud WismanSchool of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Paula WrightDepartment of Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
Steve Stewart-WilliamsSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Semenyih, Malaysia.

Funding

The Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 315952/2021-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A prospective partner’s sexual history provides important information that can be used to minimise mating-related risks. Such information includes the number of past sexual partners, which has an inverse relationship with positive suitor evaluation. However, sexual encounters with new partners vary in frequency over time, providing an additional dimension of context not previously considered. Across three studies (N = 5,331) with 15 samples, we demonstrate that the impact of past partner number on a suitor’s desirability as a long-term partner varies as a function of distribution over time. Using graphical representations of a suitor’s sexual history, we found that past partner number effects were smaller when the frequency of new sexual encounters decreased over time. This moderation effect was stronger, and often curvilinear, when past partner numbers were higher. We replicated these findings in 11 countries from five world regions. Sex differences were minimal and inconsistent pointing to a lack of a sexual double standards. Sociosexuality (openness to casual sex) was a consistent moderator and tended to mute the sexual history effects. These findings suggest that people not only attend to a potential long-term mate’s quantity of sexual partners, but also the context surrounding these encounters such as pattern and timing. Together, the findings raise the possibility of an evolved mechanism for managing mating risks present in both sexes and across populations and adds nuance to a contentious topic of public interest.

Indexed as

Sexual BehaviorSexual PartnersFemaleHumansMaleCross-cultural psychologyEvolutionary psychologyMate preferencesSexSociosexuality

Identifiers

PMID40745437
PMCPMC12313963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.