ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2025
Automated analysis of ECG signals using nonlinearity and nonstationarity features fed into the MobilenetV2 CNN powered by transfer learning.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AFB) and atrial flutter (AFL) are cardiac arrhythmias very often associated with the aggravation of other cardiac pathologies and increase the risk of stroke and heart failure. Their detection is therefore crucial. Automated analysis of the ECG signal has been suggested to assist cardiologists in the diagnosis of AFB and AFL. In this paper, a novel automated electrocardiogram (ECG) signal analysis method to aid in the detection of AFB and AFL is presented. The first step of the method consists of processing the original ECG signal. The second step carries out the classification using a modified MobileNetV2 convolutional neural network (CNN) powered by transfer learning. This CNN classifies the fed-in ECG signals into atrial fibrillation (AFB), atrial flutter (AFL), other (OTH), normal sinus rhythms (NOR), and noisy (NOI) recordings. The performance of the proposed method was assessed and scored using the Physio Net/Computing in Cardiology (CinC) 2017 dataset and the MIT-BIH Atrial Fibrillation Database (MIT-BIH). The experimental results showed that the proposed method gave an F1 score of 96.08%, sensitivity of 97.1%, specificity of 99.53%, and accuracy of 95.1% for atrial fibrillation, for the CinC 2017 dataset. For the MIT-BIH dataset, an F1 score of 99.54%, sensitivity of 99.51%, specificity of 99.64%, and accuracy of 99.5% were obtained. The results disclosed above on 2 databases prove that the proposed algorithm is efficient, robust, and can be used to assist cardiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40745424What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.