ArticleNeurological research and practice2025
Stroke survivors show an overestimation of their on-road driving performance.
Article in Neurological research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesStrokes are often accompanied by physical and cognitive impairments affecting driving safety. After the recommended period of abstinence from driving, the patient must decide whether his or her driving safety is still impaired, which requires a valid self-assessment of the own driving skills. At present, it is uncertain whether stroke survivors are able to provide a valid self-assessment.
methods12 stroke patients and 17 healthy controls participated in this prospective longitudinal on-road study. All participants underwent repeated neuropsychological and standardized on-road assessment at 4-month intervals (2 and 6 months after the stroke in the patient group). Statistical analyses included repeated measures ANOVA, group comparisons and correlation analyses.
resultsOur results revealed that in stroke survivors compared to healthy drivers, the validity of self-assessment (VSA) of the own on-road driving performance is impaired in the direction of overestimation (at both time points). In addition, the VSA of stroke survivors at second time point correlated with driving-relevant cognitive and non-cognitive measures. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that the VSA of the own driving competence is impaired after stroke. Other than expected, the differences between stroke survivors and healthy drivers did not disappear within the 4-months-interval. Consequently, an impaired VSA in stroke survivors must be considered before deciding to let them drive again.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.