Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40745340›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2025

Breast-milk substitute marketing practices in four countries: an analysis using a community-based approach.

Ellie Mulpeter, Anna Blair, Jeni Stevens, Marianne White, Elisabeth Sterken, Kristin Stewart, Barbara O'Connor, Kajsa Brimdyr, Karin Cadwell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ellie MulpeterInfant Feeding Action Coalition, South Dennis, MA, USA. info@infactusa.org.
Anna BlairHealthy Children Project, Inc, Harwich, MA, USA.
Jeni StevensWestern Sydney University, Penrith, Australia.
Marianne WhiteNHS Tayside, Dundee, Scotland.
Elisabeth SterkenInfant Feeding Action Coalition (INFACT) Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kristin StewartHealthy Children Project, Inc, Harwich, MA, USA.
Barbara O'ConnorHealthy Children Project, Inc, Harwich, MA, USA.
Kajsa BrimdyrHealthy Children Project, Inc, Harwich, MA, USA.
Karin CadwellHealthy Children Project, Inc, Harwich, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis quantitative study engaged volunteer participants and a scavenger hunt application with the purpose of collecting photographic data of the breadth and scope of violations of the World Health Organization's Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes ("the Code") and subsequent World Health Assembly Resolutions, in four industrialized countries- the United States ("U.S."), Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom ("U.K."). These four countries do not have or do not adequately enforce their related polices or laws. A secondary goal was to provide evidence to inform national strategic planning efforts related to the marketing practices of manufacturers and distributors of breast-milk substitutes (BMS).

methodsParticipants had to be residents of either the U.S., Australia, Canada or the U.K., and had to be 18 years old at minimum. They were recruited via social media, conference attendance and professional networks. Participants completed a demographic survey and downloaded the scavenger hunt application onto their mobile devices. The application directed participants to fulfill as many of the thirty total "missions," which were provided by the research team, by uploading photographic evidence of images that they believed were examples of breaches of the Code. Data collection occurred from July 19, 2023 through July 31, 2024. The research team assessed, recategorized and calculated the numbers of participant submissions after the data collection phase. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software was utilized to conduct descriptive statistics, including Pearson's chi-squared and residuals.

resultsIn total, 738 individuals were eligible and consented to participation in the study. Of those individuals, 323 continued on to the scavenger hunt application. After evaluation by the research team to assess if participant submissions were submitted under the appropriate "mission" within the application, and then if their submission qualified as a true violation of the Code, 138 submitted violations were verified and included in the analysis. Key findings include the prevalence of digital marketing violations across all four countries, false, unsubstantiated marketing claims on BMS, a lack of key instructions on the preparation, handling and storage on labels of infant formula products and the marketing violations of BMS in healthcare facilities.

conclusionsBreaches of the Code are prevalent across the U.S., the U.K., Australia and Canada and expose the public to misleading marketing tactics. To safeguard breastfeeding from exploitative digital marketing practices, countries must legislate the Code into national law and commit to its implementation through advocacy, policy and enactment.

Indexed as

BreastfeedingChild feedingChild nutritionInternational code of marketing of breast-milk substitutesPublic health

Identifiers

PMID40745340
PMCPMC12315357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.