ArticleBMC psychology2025
Learning factors influencing second language proficiency: a cross-cultural comparative study of English and Chinese L2 learners.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobalization has spurred a rise in second language (L2) learners, necessitating deeper understanding of psychological and cognitive factors shaping their learning processes. While prior research focuses predominantly on English second language (ESL) learners, studies involving learners of other languages remain scarce. This study bridges this gap by examining learning motivation, strategies, and styles across ESL learners and Chinese second language (CSL) learners.
methodsWe surveyed 312 learners, using the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) and the Perceptual Learning Style Preference Questionnaire (PLSPQ), College English Test (CET) and the Hanyu Shuiping Kaoshi (HSK) to assess variables. Data were analyzed using SPSS for correlation and regression.
resultsDivergent patterns emerged between groups. For ESL learners, learning motivation directly shaped strategy use, which in turn were positively correlated with learning proficiency, with visual learning styles further enhancing the degree of proficiency. Conversely, CSL learners exhibited no significant motivation-strategy link, and learning strategies negatively predicted proficiency. However, group-based learning styles positively influenced CSL proficiency.
conclusionsThese results highlight that the impact of learning factors on proficiency varies across different L2 learners. Proficiency levels influence the choice of learning strategies and preferences. Consequently, teaching strategies should be dynamically adjusted to align with learners' cultural backgrounds, proficiency levels, and individual learning factors, which can enhance the effectiveness of second language education and better support diverse learner needs. This study emphasizes the need for adaptive educational practices and further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.